How do you bail out Main Street? And how would such a Taxpayer bail out get repaid?
In all the other recent Bail Outs, the Taxpayers got repaid ( in whole or for the most part) by those who were Bailed Out.
The Big Banks repaid all of their Bail Outs, with a $40 Billion profit to the Taxpayers. AIG repaid it's Bail Out, with a sizable profit to the Taxpayers as well. Even the Auto Companies repaid most of their Bail Out funds.
In all of these Bail Outs the recipients gave the government stock, warrants , other collateral, or otherwise promised to repay the Bail Out. They did repay their Bail Outs, and in the case of the Big Banks in a relatively short time .
How would we Bail Out Main Street? What kind of collateral would the government receive? And once the Taxpayers did Bail Out Main Street, how would the Taxpayers get repaid?
I'm not trying to be cute or facetious. I just would like to know the answers to these questions because the question of why Main Street has not been Bailed Out has become such a mainstay of our political discourse.
Eric
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Today's Red Guard?
Seeing recent videos of The Red Guard rallies in
connection the 50th anniversary of the
Cultural Revolutions reminds me of Sanders young supporters.
Recall how Mao dealt with inequality. Totalitarianism
appears to be only effective solution to income inequality. However we all know
how well that went.
What other solutions are there in a free society?
>
> The senator’s supporters were incensed at a state
convention they believe epitomized a rigged political system, with some
threatening officials online.
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Progress Deniers
What am I missing?
It struck me while
riding the train to work, and going to
and from the United Center, and just generally travelling around the City of Chicago and
the Country, that it's obvious that there has been substantial improvement in
quality of life for most Americans in my lifetime.
I remember looking
out the window on those rides years ago and things have improved big time.
In addition, I'm seeing so many women and minorities in
all walks of life . Business managers and executives, lawyers, doctors,
bankers, government, military-- I could go on and on. Major positive change.
The hard core poor have Medicaid, Food Stamps and
subsidized housing, among other safety net programs. What they need is more jobs and better training for the age we live in.
Crime is down. Of course problems persist , especially gun violence
Rust Belt cities have rebounded and Gentrification of city neighborhood has become a bigger concern than what once was called Urban Decay. However the poor have not disappeared and homelessness and poverty persists.
Rust Belt cities have rebounded and Gentrification of city neighborhood has become a bigger concern than what once was called Urban Decay. However the poor have not disappeared and homelessness and poverty persists.
The quality of the environment has improved in
the air, land and water.
We now are approaching energy independence and fossil fuel alternative energy sources are becoming more viable
We now are approaching energy independence and fossil fuel alternative energy sources are becoming more viable
Safety has improved for cars, work place and in
general.
Major improvements in food production and consumption- the whole natural/ organic, farm- to-table/ locally grown ,
healthier food movements.
Only working poor and working class white men are doing worse, or have experienced little progress. Also the cost of higher education ( while more
accessible) has become out of reach without incurring crushing debt.
Yet all politicians and most media , not just Trump and
Sanders, say these are the worst of times, and harken back to a bygone era. When was that?
I know I live and work in an "ivory tower" ,
and I'm not as aware of the world the poor inhabit. However with respect to the undeniable progress that has
been made over the last several decades, what am I missing here? Why are so many in denial of that progress?
Eric
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)